🔗 Share this article

Imagine the following: a happy the Danish striker in a Napoli shirt. Next, juxtapose it with a sad-looking Benjamin Sesko in a Manchester United kit, looking as if he just missed an open goal. Do not bother finding a real picture of him missing; background information is your adversary. Then, include statistics in a large, silly font. Don't forget the emojis. Share it across all platforms.

Would you mention that Højlund's goal count features scores in the Champions League while Sesko does not compete in Europe? Certainly not. And would you highlight that several of the Dane's goals came against weaker national sides, or that Denmark is much stronger to Slovenia and generates many more scoring opportunities. If you manage social media for a large outlet, pure interaction is what pays the bills, Manchester United are the prime target, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

Thus the cycle of content spins. The next job is to sift through a lengthy interview featuring the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he describes the signing of Sesko "weird". Just before, where he prefaces his comments by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, cut that. Nobody needs that. Simply ensure "strange" and "Sesko" are paired in the headline. People will be furious.

This Time of Potential and Premature Judgment

Mid-autumn has traditionally one of my favourite periods to watch football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are newly formed, everything is new and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the season ahead are planting their flags. The summer market is closed. No one is talking about the quadruple yet. All teams are in contention. Right now, anything is possible.

However, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has long been one of my least favourite times to read about football. For while no outcomes are decided, something must always be getting settled. The City winger is resurgent. Florian Wirtz has been a major letdown. Could Semenyo be the best player in the league right now? Please a decision immediately.

Sesko as The Prime Example

In many ways, Sesko feels like the archetype in this respect, a player inextricably trapped between football's opposing, non-negotiable forces. The need to delay definitive judgment, allowing layers of technical texture and tactical sophistication to mature. And the imperative to produce permanent definitive judgment, a conveyor belt of takes and memes, out-of-context condemnations and meaningless comparisons, a puzzle that can never truly be solved.

It is not my aim to offer a substantive evaluation of Sesko's time at Manchester United to date. He has been in the lineup on four occasions in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, scored two goals, and had a grand total of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we evaluating? Nor do I propose to duplicate the pundits' seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel passionately on a podcast over whether he needs 10 goals to be a success this year (one pundit), or whether it is more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Harsh Reality

Despite this I loved watching Sesko at Leipzig: a powerful, screeching sports car of a striker, playing in a team ideally suited to his abilities: afforded the license to attack but also the freedom to miss. And in part this is why United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be at the moment: a place where "brutal verdicts" are summarily issued in about the time it takes to load a short advertisement, the club with the widest and most pitiless gulf between the time and air he needs, and the opportunity he is likely to receive.

There was an example of this during the national team pause, when a viral chart handily stated that the player had been judged – decisively – the worst signing of the summer transfer window by a poll of 20 agents. Naturally, the press are by no means alone in such behavior. Club channels, influencers, unidentified profiles with a oddly high number of pornbot followers: all parties with skin in the game is now essentially operating along the identical rules, an environment explicitly geared for controversy.

The Psychological Toll

Endless scrolling and tapping. What are we doing to ourselves? Do we realize, on any level, what this infinite sluice of aggravation is doing to our minds? Separate from the inherent strangeness of playing in the middle of this, aware on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that each aspect about players is now essentially content, product, open-source property to be packaged and traded.

And yes, in part this is because it's Manchester United, the corpse that keeps nourishing the narrative, a big club that must always be producing the strong emotions. But also, in part this is a temporary malaise, a swing of judgment most visibly and harshly glimpsed at this time of year, about a month after the transfer market shut. Throughout the summer we have been desiring players, praising them, salivating over them. Yet, only a handful of games later, a lot of those very players are now being disdained as broken goods. Is it time to worry about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need Viktor Gyökeres wise? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

A Wider Issue

It seems fitting that he faces Liverpool on Sunday: a team at once on a long unbeaten run at their stadium in the league and somehow in their own state of feverish crisis, like submitting a a report on someone who popped to the store 30 minutes ago. Too open. Their star finished. Alexander Isak waste of money. The coach losing his hair.

Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the storyline of football has begun to supplant football itself, to influence the way we watch it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and reaction, something that occurs in the background while we scroll through our phones, unable to detach from the saline drip of opinions and further hot takes. Perhaps this player bearing the brunt at present. But in a way, everyone is sacrificing something here.