🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you compare that with what average American pays. I can name multiple businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When you add these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to much of federal defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.