🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.