🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, following a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.